Share this article:
Print

The diesel connection: Investigators looking at similarities in BP explosions

Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

by By Dave Fehling / 11 News

khou.com

Posted on July 8, 2010 at 12:36 AM

Updated Thursday, Jul 8 at 12:36 AM

HOUSTON—The BP blowout happened miles offshore, but it may have something in common with deadly explosions on land in the Houston area. The connection is being revealed in hearings held by the U.S. Coast Guard and the U.S. Minerals Management Service in Kenner, Louisiana.

Judging from a line of questioning repeated over and over as crew members of the doomed Deepwater Horizon rig testified, federal investigators want to know what role diesel engines may have played in igniting the methane gas that blew up the rig and engulfed it in a deadly inferno.

In a hearing held May 27, an investigator asked, "If you have a runaway scenario what is likely to occur?"

"It’ll just run till it blows up," responded Chad Murray, Transocean’s chief electrician.

Transocean is the company that owned the Deepwater Horizon and rented it to BP.

The testimony was about a phenomenon known as a runaway diesel engine, or diesel overspeed.

On the BP rig the night of April 20, crews said they heard the diesel-powered generators start running at higher and higher speeds.

"I just come out of my shop, I heard a bunch of high pressure noise, and when I come out of my shop I went to go through that door and that’s when it exploded," said Murray.

What might have been happening?

"There was a large gas cloud released from there and part of that gas cloud got sucked up into the air intake," Sam Mannan said when asked to speculate about the explosion. Mannan is the director of Texas A&M’s Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center in College Station.

It’s a danger long recognized in the oil exploration and petrochemical industries.

On rigs, diesel engines are used to generate electric power. At refineries and tank farms, diesel engines can be found powering trucks that routinely go in and out of the plants .

If there’s a leak of an explosive vapor, like the methane gas that came up in the BP well, it can get sucked into the diesel engine’s air intake. That can cause the engine to rev out of control and backfire. The engines themselves may even explode.

11 News reported on this danger in April 2009, showing how the design of a diesel engine isn’t like your gasoline-powered car. Experts explained how turning the key to "off" won’t shut down a diesel engine that’s sucking in an explosive vapor. It just keeps on running because, unlike gasoline engines, diesels use compression—not spark plugs—to ignite the fuel.

11 News showed how a runaway diesel engine in a pickup truck is thought to have been what ignited the explosion at BP’s Texas City refinery in 2005. That explosion killed 15 workers.

In a video animation of the explosion prepared by the U.S. Chemical Safety Board, an announcer explains how "two workers fled, unable to shut off the engine. Moments later, witnesses saw the truck backfire and ignite the vapor cloud."

Runaway diesel engines on tanker trucks were also linked to an explosion in Brazoria County in 2003 that killed three workers.

Sam Mannan at Texas A&M said while even cell phones can ignite gas clouds, a diesel engine is worse.

"All ignition sources are not alike. (A diesel engine) creates what’s known in the science as a bang-box type of explosion which has more probability to lead to a high-intensity explosion," said Mannan.

That risk led to government mandates that diesel engines used on offshore rigs must be equipped with emergency shut-off valves that are supposed to cut off the air intake, killing the engine.

At those hearings in Louisiana, an investigator asked, "Were there any safety devices to prevent engine overspeed on those pieces of equipment?"

"Yes, there were," replied Douglas Brown, Transocean’s chief rig mechanic.

The investigator asked Brown, "In your opinion, did those function properly?

"No," replied Brown.

Experts said if the valves had worked, the Deepwater Horizon might never have had the catastrophic explosion that sunk it.

"If (valves are) installed properly and maintained properly, these things can be prevented," said Eric Schellenberger, president of a Houston-based company called AMOT, which makes safety valves that function automatically.

Their valves were not on the Deepwater Horizon. But in recent days, the company said there has been a lot more interest in them as the energy industry looks for ways to reduce risks.

"We have seen an increase in order activity and inquires," said Schellenberger.

He said AMOT has been asking Federal regulators to extend the requirement for safety valves to diesel engines used not only on offshore rigs, but also on engines used onshore at facilities where explosive vapors might present a danger. But so far, no such requirements have been mandated by the government.

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

HTML is not allowed.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 9 of 9

wontbesilenced said on July 8, 2010 at 3:00 PM

justdad, Perhaps it isn't so much blaming Bush personally as it is the effect of his administrations leadership. That was the most oil friendly administration in history, including his father who was much more moderate. I feel it was the close relationship with big oil that led to worse than lax regulation. It is possible that if the regulators were doing their jobs, this could have been prevented. That does not take away from BP's blame. BP knew what they were doing, they knew the risk they were taking and MMS let them get away with it in exchange for all kinds of gifts. This is just one more example that proves industry does not and will not regulate itself.

47053243
Flag this comment

josephngalv said on July 8, 2010 at 2:26 PM

Well said justdad

47050948
Flag this comment

rogerdsl said on July 8, 2010 at 10:24 AM

The Diesel engines do not over run when there is gas out side the combustion chambers, they ignite the gas and create an explosion. If the engine over run was because the load was lost instantly and the relays should have been activated to kill the generators and the engines. These was not suppose to be gas where the diesel generators are. Before this there were some similar incidents with other BP operated rigs which created a massive investigation due to problems with the diesel generators.

47031073
Flag this comment

houstonman56 said on July 8, 2010 at 7:53 AM

The chief rig mechanic said the safety valves were on the engines but didn't function. Kinda like the back-up ram on the blowout preventer. Sounds like someone should review their maintenance program! :o|

47018608
Flag this comment

justdad said on July 8, 2010 at 6:37 AM

native47 and wontbesilenced, While the president IS the most powerful man in the free world, there are some things that he does leave to lesser men...When things like this happen we all look for some one to blame. That's human nature. It is easiest to place the blame on a known person, such is the case with blaming the president. Rather than point fingers at the people in the industry that should have recognized the potential problem, especially after the BP explosion in Texas City, people we don't know, we look to those names we recognize such as the president. I didn't care for George W. and Barack is weraing thin, but neither of them is truly responsible in any way for this disaster. Instead of pointing fingers at the government, try pointing them at the industry that caused this problem. The government isn't in the oil business, yet.

47013688
Flag this comment

wontbesilenced said on July 8, 2010 at 5:44 AM

Amazing we had a President for 8 years that was and is neck deep in the oil industry yet he never did anything to make drilling safer. You would think with all the experience someone like the former VP who used to run Halliburton, would have have thought of these things. I get that weak minded individuals want to blame Obama but look at the facts, we had oil people in the White House for 8 years, it was their failings that led to this disaster.

47011548
Flag this comment

native47 said on June 30, 2010 at 6:24 AM

He said AMOT has been asking Federal regulators to extend the requirement for safety valves to diesel engines used not only on offshore rigs, but also on engines used onshore at facilities where explosive vapors might present a danger. But so far, no such requirements have been mandated by the government. .... The Obama administration has no interest in preemptive measures.

46505643
Flag this comment

masterchief said on June 29, 2010 at 11:08 PM

SORRY "you would think that BP"

46496088
Flag this comment

masterchief said on June 29, 2010 at 11:00 PM

You who think that BP's "smart people" would know that methane & diesel EXPLODE 1st year chem.students know this. BP did you for get Texas City 2005 same thing.

46495833
Flag this comment